Re: Draft 1.9c
- From: raster rasterman com
- To: Marko Macek gmx net
- cc: wm-spec-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Draft 1.9c
- Date: Thu, 25 Nov 1999 00:39:01 -0800 (PST)
On 25 Nov, Marko Macek scribbled:
-> raster@rasterman.com wrote:
->
-> > well thsi can be done just by PID :) oh hold on.. hmm no actually if
-> > the spawnign spawns a process that spawns yet another process that
-> > spanws yet another process (ie scriptS) then we have isses.. yes an
-> > inherited evnironment variable set by the wm fo rthat "launch" that is
-> > then set on all widnows displayed by that app.. yes.. i see this use..
-> > perhaps it shoudl be in the spec (apps have to set a property ont he
-> > window thta is the contents of thsi variable (numeric) ie:
-> > _NET_INSTANCE_ID(CARDINAL)
->
-> I support this (and PID), but _INSTANCE_ID should be a string.
hmmm - comments? i dont really have a prefernce... :)
--
--------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) raster@rasterman.com raster@valinux.com
raster@enlightenment.org raster@linux.com
raster@zip.com.au
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]