Re: Decorations (again)
- From: Michael ROGERS <M Rogers cs ucl ac uk>
- To: wm-spec-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Decorations (again)
- Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 13:00:55 +0000
>Scrapping the existing method does mean a lot of work all round. WMs that
>don't already have a pager (sawmill springs to mind) will need to acquire
>one. Someone needs to come up with a CORBA interface, although I suspect
>that that can be left out of the intial spec.
>
>However, I have always thought that separating the WM from its pager
>wasn't a great idea, and that trying to make a one-size-fits-all universal
>pager will always lead to feature/usability shortcomings.
>
>The only problem is that any WM may require several different flavours of
>pager - eg. an applet for Gnome, a standalone variant, a KDE variant.
I think the Gnome panel can now swallow windows, making it possible to have a
standalone pager embedded in the panel. If the KDE panel can do that too, the
WM would only need to provide one pager (widget set issues aside).
Michael
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]