Re: Sv: Window Manager configuration utilities

[Nathan Clemons <nathan windsofstorm net>]

Personally, my opinion is that if a WM has a config tool already, to just
use it; and if it doesn't, then someone (probably should be someone from
the WM group in question) should write it. Does it really matter how the
config tools are organized? Isn't this an appropriate forum for WM
individuality? Otherwise, you will have to update your library every time
E adds a new feature, and the people maintaining the capplets will have to
wait for you to update the library for them to update the capplet and
people wait several weeks longer than necessary when the E WM includes its
own config tool.

Maybe I'm off-base here, but I see this as somewhat redundant.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nathan P. Clemons                       "Peace favor your code."
nathan@windsofstorm.net                 ICQ: 2810688
IN CONSTRUCTION:                        http://gnome.windsofstorm.net
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Fri, 9 Jul 1999, Kenneth Christiansen wrote:

> Hi again. I just wanted to say a little more about the libeipc library. 
> Knut have just made it independent of gnome, so the KDE team
> also can use the library to create enlightenment applet for their
> control center :-)
> 
> Kenneth.
> 
> 
> ---
> 
> We have created (or mostly Knut created) a library for communicating with
> the ipc in enlightenment (libeipc). This is almost finished now, and working
> well so it shouldn't be much of a problem to create the remaining capplets.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail wm-spec-list-request@gnome.org with "unsubscribe"
> as the Subject.
>