Re: Window Manager configuration utilities

[Nathan Clemons <nathan windsofstorm net>]

I saw that message come through... tucked in the middle of replies to
Draft 1.9a.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nathan P. Clemons                       "Peace favor your code."
nathan@windsofstorm.net                 ICQ: 2810688
IN CONSTRUCTION:                        http://gnome.windsofstorm.net
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

On 7 Jul 1999, Greg Badros wrote:

> Matthias Ettrich <ettrich@troll.no> writes:
> 
> > > Let's limit to the WM spec itself. Any extension (config tools, docu) will
> > > only force ones or others of the WM authors now present here out of the
> > > interest for this discussion.
> > 
> > 
> > It seems we identified two different scopes on this list:
> > 
> >    1) Extended WM <-> Client communication for ordinary clients, i.e.
> >        applications    
> >    2) Propagation of WM internas for desktop-clients like panel/pager/taskbar
> > 
> > 1) is important to everybody, 2) is mainly relevant for KDE/Gnome. There's not
> > much  point in supporting 2) in systems like fvwm, since they already offer
> > desktop functionality. If I used fvwm, I wouldn't use kpanel, for instance.
> 
> Did my message about this not make it through to the list?  This was my
> comment in a nutshell, but I've not yet seen any responses to what I
> wrote.  Here's the message header I'm wondering about:
> 
> To: wm-spec-list@gnome.org
> Subject: General comment and concerns about first drafts
> From: Greg Badros <gjb@cs.washington.edu>
> Date: 04 Jul 1999 12:32:50 -0700
> Message-ID: <qrr7logfbx9.fsf@elwha.cs.washington.edu>
> X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.45/XEmacs 20.4 - "Emerald"
> Lines: 144
> Xref: elwha.cs.washington.edu gnus-saved-messages:11727
> 
> I can resend if the message was lost...
> 
> Thanks,
> Greg
> 
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe: mail wm-spec-list-request@gnome.org with "unsubscribe"
> as the Subject.
>