Re: 1.9d
- From: Marko Macek <Marko Macek gmx net>
- To: Tim Janik <timj gtk org>
- CC: wm-spec-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: 1.9d
- Date: Fri, 24 Dec 1999 19:56:14 +0100
Tim Janik wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Dec 1999, Marko Macek wrote:
> > Tim Janik wrote:
> > > "_NET_WM_DESKTOP
> i didn't change anything here, this is a 1:1 *quote* from the current spec ;)
You're right. I made a mental mistake :)
I suggest not using the term "sticky" at all. It is many things to many
people. It confuses people like me (I still get confused by
desktop/page/desk fvwm terminology too).
How it should work:
0xFFFFFFFF in NET_WM_DESKTOP means that window appears on all
desktops (wmaker=omnipresent, icewm=occupy all, ...). IMO it
is not a good idea to have a flag that makes NET_WM_DESKTOP
irrelevant if the flag is set.
WIN_STATE_NOSCROLL should tell the WM to keep it in the same place
during virtual desktop scrolling/paging, if the WM implements it.
Mark
--
... There is no perfect file selection dialog...
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marko.Macek@gmx.net http://www.kiss.uni-lj.si/~k4fr0235/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]