Re: [Vala] Fwd: Possible bug of seg fault when array returned

[Jonathan Moerman <jonathanmoerman gmail com>]

Like Daniel said you're accessing uninitialized objects with the foreach
statement.
Replacing *Temp2[] x = new Temp2[50];* with *Temp2[] x = new Temp2[2];* will
work.
If you want to get a better picture of what's going on, I recommend
compiling it to c code (valac -C), you can then see that the foreach
statement is translated to a for loop that iterates 50 times.

     Jonathan Moerman

2016-02-24 16:15 GMT+01:00 Daniel Espinosa <esodan gmail com>:

> In your code you just initialize objects at 4 and 6, then when try iterates
> over first ones you access to uninitialized objects.
>
> Try to create an empty array {} then use += to add objects to it. This way
> you should create smallest array with all its members initialized.
> El feb. 24, 2016 8:21 AM, "Megh Parikh" <meghprkh gmail com> escribió:
>
> > When returning an array of objects from a method (static in my case),
> > trying  to access the objects gives segfault. This may be a bug as I
> > think the objects are freed before the code ends but I dont know for
> > sure so I am posting in mailing list instead of Bugzilla
> >
> > Dummy code (25 line)  :
> > https://gist.github.com/meghprkh/0147641f7b57466def19
> >
> > Regards,
> > Megh Parikh
> > _______________________________________________
> > vala-list mailing list
> > vala-list gnome org
> > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
> _______________________________________________
> vala-list mailing list
> vala-list gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list