Re: [Vala] Generic implementation

[Andy Lees <andrewl oz gmail com>]

Yes, I've done that, but it doesn't particularly help - what is done
depends on the implementation of the boxed duplication function used for
the generic implementation, and I have no idea where that's defined.

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Felipe de Andrade Neves Lavratti <
felipelav gmail com> wrote:

> Not really answering, but you could always run vala with -C to access the
> generated C code. There you could get tge result of the conversion.
>
>
> —
> Sent from Mailbox <https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 1:13 AM, Andy Lees <andrewl oz gmail com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > If I define a generic array implementation for type T that contains an
> > array of type T[], there is a requirement for anything > 4 bytes in size
> > to
> > be boxed. That suggests that some separate storage is created for the
> > boxed types, is that so? And if so is each element of the array as
> > appended separately allocated, or is a block allocation done as the T[]
> > array is extended?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Andrew Lees
> > _______________________________________________
> > vala-list mailing list
> > vala-list gnome org
> > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list