[Vala] Memory safety
- From: Florian Weimer <fweimer redhat com>
- To: vala-list gnome org
- Subject: [Vala] Memory safety
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 10:18:09 +0200
Hi,
am I correct in assuming that Vala is supposed to inherit the lack of
memory safety from C? Or put differently: If there is Vala code that
does not guard callers from memory safety violations but it could do so,
this is not a problem because callers are generally expected to fulfill
such (implicit) preconditions.
Is this documented somewhere?
Thanks,
Florian
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]