Re: [Vala] difference between using IntegerType and inheriting
- From: rastersoft <raster rastersoft com>
- To: Luca Bruno <lethalman88 gmail com>
- Cc: Vala List <vala-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Vala] difference between using IntegerType and inheriting
- Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 12:00:14 +0100
My question, really, is which one is the best to define in a VAPI file a
typedef. This is: if I have in C
#typedef uint32_t xcb_atom_t;
is better to define it as:
[SimpleType]
[IntegerType (rank = 9)]
[CCode (cname = "xcb_atom_t", has_type_id = false)]
public struct Atom {
}
or as:
[SimpleType]
[CCode (cname = "xcb_atom_t", has_type_id = false)]
public struct Atom : uint32 {
}
?
Thanks.
El 05/01/14 22:39, Luca Bruno escribió:
You inherit all the methods from uint32? ;)
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 9:51 PM, rastersoft <raster rastersoft com> wrote:
Hi again:
Another doubt I have is: what is the difference between doing:
[SimpleType]
[IntegerType (rank = 9)]
[CCode (cname = "c_name", has_type_id = false)]
public struct StructName {
}
and
[SimpleType]
[CCode (cname = "c_name", has_type_id = false)]
public struct StructName : uint32 {
}
Thanks
--
Nos leemos
RASTER (Linux user #228804)
raster rastersoft com http://www.rastersoft.com
_______________________________________________
vala-list mailing list
vala-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
--
Nos leemos
RASTER (Linux user #228804)
raster rastersoft com http://www.rastersoft.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]