Re: [Vala] Float literal parsing and redundant fractional digits

From: Sergej Reich <sergej reich googlemail com>
To: Leszek Godlewski <lg inequation org>
Cc: vala-list gnome org
Subject: Re: [Vala] Float literal parsing and redundant fractional digits
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 20:59:07 +0200

Am Freitag, den 06.04.2012, 20:04 +0200 schrieb Leszek Godlewski:

Is there any good reason why float literals require a fractional digit
after the decimal point to be valid? I'm accustomed to writing
literals in the vein of 1.f and I find having to write 1.0f instead
quite irritating.


I'm not sure if there is a good reason but you can actually just write
1f instead.

References:
- [Vala] Float literal parsing and redundant fractional digits
  - From: Leszek Godlewski

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]