Re: [Vala] Passing user_data in signals is supported, but could be better.

[Tal Hadad <tal_hd hotmail com>]

> private static void static_on_stop_clicked ([args], user_data_type user_data) {

A copy&paste mistake in method name. Please threat this as:
private static void method ([args], user_data_type user_data) {

From: tal_hd hotmail com
To: vala-list gnome org
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:48:45 +0200
Subject: [Vala] Passing user_data in signals is supported,      but could be better.

 
Vala does support passing a "context" argument, calling user_data to callbacks,
by this two methods(source: FAQ and Tutorial):
1. Passing "this"/self as user_data, for instance method.
2. Variables outside the lambda expression.
Method 2 is done perfectly by Vala, when we talk about lambda expression.
But method 1 is not enough... Not always it's "this"/self what that needed to be
passed.
By now, two ways to overcome this, without using lambda:
* The dirty trick:
instance.event_name.connect (((instance_type*)user_data)->method);
...
private void method ([args]) {
    user_data_type* user_data = this;
    // Perform action with user_data.
}
 
* Back to basic(using GLib.Signal namespace):
Signal.connect (instance, "event_name", (GLib.Callback)method, user_data);
...
 
private static void static_on_stop_clicked ([args], user_data_type user_data) {
 
    // Perform action with user_data.
 
}
 
Both works, but I think a proper syntax should be.
I really like the instance.method way for passing callbacks, but it's valid only for
"this"/self. So, perhaps, instance:method for static methods?
What do you think? Shell Vala support this feature?
Tal
                                          

_______________________________________________
vala-list mailing list
vala-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list