Re: [Vala] Questions about vapi generation and testing
- From: bsquared <bwcode4u gmail com>
- To: vala-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Vala] Questions about vapi generation and testing
- Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:07:53 -0700
Luca Bruno <lethalman88 gmail com> writes:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 6:30 PM, bsquared <bwcode4u gmail com> wrote:
1. Is it necessary/recommended to specialize a generic?
The generated vapi has lists without specialization, and these work
fine in the tests.
public GLib.SList list_databases ();
public GLib.SList<string> list_databases ();
The latter obviously.
I ask because in the gir the elements are generic, and the compiler does
not issue warnings.
2. What can I do to optimize the generated c code in my tests?
The generated code is 4x the size of original test code
(test-couchdb-glib.c) as is the executable.
For the C code, nothing. About the executable, optimize with -O3 (or -Os).
I was thinking there may be some kind of best practice to minimize the
number of temp vars in the generated code.
--
Regards,
Brian Winfrey
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]