Re: [Vala] [BUG] Re: Closures and local variables

[Nor Jaidi Tuah <norjaidi tuah ubd edu bn>]

> > There is no error on compilation. But the result is quite surprising:
> >     sh$ valac closure.vala 
> >     sh$ ./closure
> >     1 2 1
> >     1 2 1
>
> It returned '1 0 -1' for me. That's because valac actually generated invalid
> C code with undefined behaviour.

Does Vala mandate any particular order
in evaluating arguments to a function call?
In f(a, b, c), are a, b, c evaluated in that
order?

If Vala doesn't specify the sequence, then
the undefined behaviour may be valid.

hand
Nor Jaidi Tuah