Re: [Vala] Can adding new virtual method break ABI?

[Luca Bruno <lethalman88 gmail com>]

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Jürg Billeter <j bitron ch> wrote:

> On Sun, 2011-12-11 at 11:34 +0100, Luca Bruno wrote:
> > 2011/12/11 Tal Hadad <tal_hd hotmail com>
> >
> > > This idea is based on the assumption that the size of XClass struct
> > > doesn't matter and can be changed(Am I right?).
> > > Also, how does the virtual method order is currently done by Vala? Is
> it
> > > alphabetic or by the order of the decelerations?
> >
> > The ordering does not matter, the padding does.
>
> Ordering matters as well. Vala uses declaration order.

We're talking about virtual methods, aren't we? There's no ABI break if the
order of N pointers is exchanged.

-- 
www.debian.org - The Universal Operating System