[Vala] Filling structures
- From: pancake <pancake youterm com>
- To: vala-list gnome org
- Subject: [Vala] Filling structures
- Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 13:07:55 +0200
I have already opened a bug few weeks ago..with a patch that works fine,
but I'm still waiting for somebody to review it and commit it.. (jurg? :P)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=618856
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=618857
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=618933
Today I have falled in a stupid bug caused by me, but vala wasnt warning
or so.
The thing is that actually you can assign less fields than the ones
existing in
a structure:
----------------------------------------
struct Foo {
string foo;
string bar;
string cow;
}
void main() {
// should this be allowed??
Foo foo = { "jej", "jiu" }; //, "jejje" };
}
----------------------------------------
The thing is that by defining such struct in a vapi file and not filling
all fields I
fall into a segfault inside Valac.
Should non-all-fields-defined-structure-definitions be allowed by Vala?
I think it
can cause of errors and shouldnt be permitted.
Another point is...i dont think will be needed to implement support for
named
structure definition like:
Foo foo = {.foo="jeje", .bar="lala" ..}
Because this kind of constructions are not supported by all C compilers
and it
can cause errors if you only want to specify a single field. But in this
case you
can just do it like:
Foo foo;
foo.foo="lalal";
which is probably cleaner and makes the language more consistent.
What do you think about it? Should I open a bug?
--pancake
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]