Re: [Vala] signal handling in gui thread
- From: Jan Hudec <bulb ucw cz>
- To: Jiří Zárevúcky <zarevucky jiri gmail com>
- Cc: Vala-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Vala] signal handling in gui thread
- Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:24:35 +0100
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 02:20:13 +0100, Jiří Zárevúcky wrote:
Nor Jaidi Tuah píše v So 30. 01. 2010 v 09:07 +0800:
[...]
So, I emulate gtkmm's Dispatcher by replacing this:
a_signal.connect ((arg) => { things_to_do (); });
with:
a_signal.connect ((arg) => {
Idle.add_full (Priority.HIGH, () => things_to_do (); });
});
Seems to work fine. I began to wonder why the gtkmm's
Dispatcher makes contorted use of pipes.
Performance reasons, most likely.
I would not think so, even though it might have some slight advantage (adding
source to other thread's GLib.MainContext does involve some locks while pipes
do not). Rather I would expect it either pre-dates some important API changes
regarding threads and main loops in GLib (it used to miss a couple of things
and working with non-default contexts is still a bit unwieldy), or the author
didn't think about this method.
--
Jan 'Bulb' Hudec <bulb ucw cz>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]