Sam Liddicott píše v Út 12. 01. 2010 v 07:25 +0000:
Overloading could easily be supported with mandatory cname or csuffix attributes; that an explicit name needs to be given for C is no reason that it needs to be given for vala which could do regular overloading. I think it ought to be supported. Sam
That's a matter of opinion. If Vala supported it, people would start using cnames like "lib_class_some_action", "lib_class_some_action2", "lib_class_some_action3", etc. Overloading exists because people are lazy, ain't that true? :) Even if they wouldn't, it would still make things considerably messier IMO (I, for one, do like the way I can use most C libraries without separate Vala docs or searching VAPI). But anyway, if you really want it, you could just implement it and send it to Jürg for approval. Just think whether you really need it. From my POV, it's pointless. BTW, please use a mail client that supports message threads. :)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy