Re: [Vala] Building problem

["aecostas gmail com" <aecostas gmail com>]

Thanks Andrea,

it works making "public" both class Foo and the struct Sub.

But, the weirdest thing is that it compiles fine after removing the
ArrayList field.

using Gee;

class Foo : GLib.Object {
    struct Sub {
        public long initime;
        public int duration;
        //  public ArrayList<string> text;


    }

}

In this case it compiles even without making public the class and the
struct.

Any explanation?


2010/8/11 Andrea Del Signore <sejerpz tin it>

> On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 00:35 +0200, aecostas gmail com wrote:
> > /* Foo */
> > using Gee;
> >
> > class Foo : GLib.Object {
> >     struct Sub {
> >         public long initime;
> >         public int duration;
> >         public ArrayList<string> text;
> >     }
> >
> > }
>
> Hi,
>
> your problem is with the class Foo if you should define it to be public:
>
> /* Foo */
> using Gee;
>
> public class Foo : GLib.Object {
>    public struct Sub {
>         public long initime;
>        public int duration;
>        public ArrayList<string> text;
>    }
> }
>
> What I don't know is why vala doesn't report an error when compiling
> your example code since you are accessing a private structure.
>
> Is just a vala compiler bug or the default scope of classes and structs
> *is not* private when not specified?
>
> Regards,
>         Andrea


-- 
Andrés Estévez Costas
Mi Blog: http://andresestevez.blogspot.com
Colaboro en Enxeñería sen Fronteiras Galicia: http://galicia.isf.es
Socio Fundador de: http://www.ghandalf.org