Re: [Vala] vala.vim updated

[Hans Vercammen <hveso3 gmail com>]

On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 00:45 +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Hans Vercammen <hveso3 gmail com> wrote:
> > Another (not uncommon) option would be to distribute syntax files with
> > the vala tarball, so it always matches the installed release. But I
> > don't have a strong opinion about this since writing vala code isn't and
> > shouldn't be favored to any kind of editor.
>
> I don't think that would be a bad thing, at least for some time. I
> personally use more emacs than vim, and gedit. But I get along with
> all of them. In the same way as git as many editor/tools in "extra"
> (or was it "contrib"), it does not favor any.

Cool, but we probably need some configure options nonetheless.

> If the maintainer agrees to have them as part of the release, that
> would be nice for distributions to package (instead of just a file,
> living somewhere in a wiki page).

Much agreed! And it would be much easier to keep them in sync with the
vala release.

Regards,
Hans