Re: [Vala] Implicit lamdas/closures

["Sam Liddicott" <sam liddicott com>]

The delgates may have extra parameters though and not be glib based.

Sam

-----Original Message-----
From: JürgBilleter <j bitron ch>
Sent: 02 November 2008 07:30
To: Christian Hergert <christian hergert gmail com>
Cc: Sam Liddicott <sam liddicott com>; vala-list gnome org
Subject: Re: [Vala] Implicit lamdas/closures


On Sat, 2008-11-01 at 18:01 -0700, Christian Hergert wrote:
> It would be useful if delegates could through exceptions here too.
> Particularly when you do async calls that take a delegate.

Delegates can already throw exceptions. However, I don't really see the
relation to async calls as it won't be necessary to manually pass
delegates to the async methods. I'll write some examples when it's
working.

Jürg