Re: [Utopia] is gmv only ment for mountable stuff?

[Robert Love <rml ximian com>]

On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 11:07 -0400, John (J5) Palmieri wrote:

> I think what we need for the future is something similar to xinet.d for
> services.  Basically have a single daemon that can efficiently route
> messages to different policy engines without them having to run as
> daemons.

HAL does this now via callouts.

It works great, but it runs things as root and not as the user.  I like
the current delineation between system and user-level, so I suppose one
idea is to add per-(logged in)-user callouts.

	Robert Love