Re: [Usability] GTK+ at the UX Hackfest
- From: Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
- To: Piñeiro <apinheiro igalia com>
- Cc: jimmac novell com, usability gnome org, gnome-accessibility-list gnome org, cosimoc gnome org, gtk-devel-list gnome org, wwalker gnome org, bratsche gnome org, hylkebons gmail com
- Subject: Re: [Usability] GTK+ at the UX Hackfest
- Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 12:17:44 +0000
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 17:38 +0100, Piñeiro wrote:
> From: Cosimo Cecchi <cosimoc gnome org>
>
> > On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 16:44 +0100, Piñeiro wrote:
> >
> >> In the gtk side, I don't know much about the XSettings, but I suppose
> >> that you are talking more general, and XSetting will manage all the
> >> gtk modules to be loaded (engines, and so on). So XSettings would have
> >> the lists of modules instead of the envvar, and inform to the
> >> applications that this setting has changed. In this case is just
> >> load/unload the a11y modules as any other gtk modules.
> >
> > AFAIK GTK+ already reads the XSettings variable and loads modules
> > accordingly in gtk_init(). The filling of that property is currently
> > done by gnome-settings-daemon.
>
> Yes, you are right, I have just made a quick search, thanks.
>
> Probably people like Mathias Clasen, Li Yuan and Willie Walker knows
> more about xsettings and a11y relation. After another quick search on
> the bugzilla, I found some interesting (and resolved) bugs about this
> issue:
I should have mentioned that it's Willie I was talking to last week, and
that brought up this potential problem.
Matthias told me that the XSettings are already
instant-apply/instant-load, so that's not the problem for an
instant-apply a11y, registration is more likely the problem.
Cheers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]