Re: [Usability] Overthinking things.
- From: Allan Caeg <allancaeg gmail com>
- To: kerberos piestar net
- Cc: usability gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Usability] Overthinking things.
- Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:42:15 +0800
What's your point and what are you trying to suggest exactly?
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 10:31 +0000, kerberos piestar net wrote:
> There's lots of talk of recording input, technical bug-tracking
> solutions, and other technical solutions to the apparent usability
> problem, but can I say I think we are putting the horse miles before
> the cart here?
>
> I owned and ran an internet cafe for a few years and basically spent
> most of every day helping users of all ages, abilities and backgrounds
> get online, sign up with email, scan things, write documents, all the
> basic stuff. This was early-mid 2000's so people were still
> unfamiliar with the internet as a rule. It taught me to think like a
> user, rather than as a geek, and gave me an understanding of UI design
> since after showing the 100th person how to do something it made me
> acutely aware of where people (and software) went wrong. Dumb things
> I previously had nothing but disdain for such like wizards made my
> life so much easier.
>
> There is no point trying to do user focus testing when there has been
> little to no attention to usability paid so far. User testing is to
> confirm that your ideas work (or don't work) and to identify problems,
> while the current system seems largely to me to have grown out of
> necessity and lacks any cohesive ideas in the first place - it's more
> of a developer plaything than a user-centric designed system.
>
> Plus the users comments are largely worthless anyhow. Seeing where
> they are going wrong is the important bit, but it is a bit redundant
> if most good usability experts can spot it without them and come up
> with good solutions in the process. Ideally on a lot of projects what
> is required is going back to the start, considering each feature and
> asking 'is this the best that can be done here'. Only once you
> yourself are happy with it should the users be set upon it.
>
> I think there is an affinity for trying to find a technical solution
> (in the form of trackers, testing and stats) to what is essentially a
> human problem with (unfortunatley) no correct answers.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Usability mailing list
> Usability gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]