Re: [Usability] Usability Digest, Vol 49, Issue 5
- From: Calum Benson <Calum Benson Sun COM>
- To: Johannes Kingma <johannes kingma gmail com>
- Cc: usability gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Usability] Usability Digest, Vol 49, Issue 5
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 17:27:03 +0100
On 13 May 2008, at 01:28, Johannes Kingma wrote:
I disagree here totally. The conflict dialog is one of the few very
usefull, easy to understand and idiot proof features. The best thing
is that the three options are buttons which reduce the click-amount to
the absolute minimum.
One problem is they don't actually look like buttons, though (or at
least, they didn't to Andy and I). As Andy also points out, that the
most prominent feature in the dialog (the icons) is the least useful
in many cases, because the 'before' and 'after' will often be identical.
I've no doubt the dialog works for some people (like yourself), and
that it works better when the icons are recognisable thumbnails, and
that some amount of usability testing was probably done on it. I'd
just like to think we can do better :)
Cheeri,
Calum.
--
CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland
mailto:calum benson sun com GNOME Desktop Team
http://blogs.sun.com/calum +353 1 819 9771
Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]