|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Probably the strangest thing about that situation is that it leaves a large blank space under the last item. Jacob Beauregard wrote: > forgot the image.. hope that 83kb won't kill anyone's inbox. > > Jacob Beauregard wrote: >> Yea, I know I've probably whined about combo boxes enough, but >> honestly, does this image make sense to you? >> >> This is just one occurrence in many that I've had. I can only see 3 >> out of 7 options. Less than half of the options being used is just >> not good practice. That's only 2 out of 7 odds (not good) that the >> service type I want is going to immediately visible and navigable. >> >> While I believe it's a good idea to allow combo boxes to be >> open-ended, I just don't understand why visibility doesn't pay a >> larger role. The best argument I've heard is preserving motion >> memory. However, anything lacking in visibility is far from intuitive. >> _______________________________________________ >> Usability mailing list >> Usability gnome org >> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability >> >> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > Usability mailing list > Usability gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG9qqEX2SHyykm3j4RAjP7AJ9N1fMsLrtOsXCjS87JWnQAlHpGPgCfcmxt DZYOxMm7FefnoiX7ToyG8YU= =bumA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |