Re: [Usability] FW: UI Responsiveness
- From: Matthew Paul Thomas <mpt myrealbox com>
- To: Usability Mailing List <usability gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Usability] FW: UI Responsiveness
- Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 01:56:18 +1300
On Nov 30, 2007, at 12:19 PM, Calum Benson wrote:
On 29 Nov 2007, at 22:58, Martin Harris wrote:
...
Also, has there been any talk about making UIs accountable for real-
time responsiveness (low-latency interactivity)? Is there anything
in the overall system that could require a UI to respond in 10
seconds, 1 second, etc?
Not quite sure what you're getting at here-- could you give an example?
...
One example is that Mac OS X's "spinning beachball of death" cursor
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spinning_wait_cursor> is not (usually)
set by the application. It is set by the underlying toolkit, if the
application has not examined its event queue in the past ~2 seconds.
That makes UIs "accountable" in the sense that the busy cursor is a
sign of a badly-written application, and users complain accordingly.
Cheers
--
Matthew Paul Thomas
http://mpt.net.nz/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]