Re: [Usability] Reasoning behind default panel setup?
- From: Joachim Noreiko <jnoreiko yahoo com>
- To: David Tenser <djst mozilla gmail com>
- Cc: usability gnome org, t_w_ freenet de
- Subject: Re: [Usability] Reasoning behind default panel setup?
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:17:08 +0000 (GMT)
--- David Tenser <djst mozilla gmail com> wrote:
> On 1/11/06, Joachim Noreiko <jnoreiko yahoo com>
> wrote:
> > The fundamental problem I see is this:
> >
> > the main GNOME menu should drop down from the top
> > panel (as a previous poster said, to match
> application
> > menus)
> > and minimizing windows up to the top of the screen
> > seems weird.
>
> Is the direction of a main menu important enough to
> warrant two
> panels?
All other menus pop down. It's a funny idea to have
the most important of all pop up. And the bottom left
corner doesn't seem like a logical place to start,
despite Microsoft's placing of the big 'Start' button
there.
> Are you absolutely serious about this being
> a "fundamental problem"?
In the sense that if one thing must go at the top, and
another at the bottom, then you are forced to have two
panels.
___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]