Re: [Usability]Revisiting bug 104549

[Mark McLoughlin <mark skynet ie>]

Hi Rodney,
	I'm not sure what you expect people on this list to do - its up to the
maintainers of the modules in question to review your patches. It looks
Owen is being relatively responsive about the gtk patches and you need
to get Anders to review the libgnomeui one.

Good Luck,
Mark.

On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 07:43, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to invite you to revisit bug 104549, which was reported
> against glade, but in actuality is a problem with how things are drawn
> in GTK+, libgnomeui, and libbonoboui (sort of). This bug also should
> probably extend to menubars, but since nobody ever uses tearoff
> menubars, it's much less of an issue, and I have not made patches for
> that yet.
> 
> Anyway, bug 104549 depends on 5 other bugs. 106337 was fixed in CVS
> before gtk+ 2.2.1 was released and I was developing against 2.2.0.
> 106361 was approved and is committed to HEAD, and is only for visual
> consistency when you do NOT use GTK_SHADOW_OUT as the shadow type for
> toolbars.
> 
> The other 3 however, really should be committed to 2.2, as they don't
> change/add api/abi at all, and improve the look up to 10 times or more.
> What do you guys think about 106335 and 106336? Owen seems to think the
> current drawing is perfectly correct, despite the several
> accounts/complaints proving otherwise. Thanks.
> 
> -- dobey
> 
> -- 
> "So I gave up on that, and tried to install gstreamer. Get this. Their
>  propose ``solution'' for distributing binaries on Red Hat systems? They
>  point you at an RPM that installs apt, the Debian package system! Yeah,
>  that's a good idea, I want to struggle with two competing packaging
>  systems on my machine just to install a single app." -- jwz
> _______________________________________________
> Usability mailing list
> Usability gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability