Re: [Usability] Re: New way of accessing software (WAS: Re: Big Panel menus (32x32))
- From: Daniel Borgmann <spark-mailinglists web de>
- To: Koen Hufkens <koen hufkens pandora be>
- Cc: David Adam Bordoley <bordoley msu edu>, usability gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Usability] Re: New way of accessing software (WAS: Re: Big Panel menus (32x32))
- Date: 15 Jun 2003 01:24:27 +0200
On Sat, 2003-06-14 at 23:58, Koen Hufkens wrote:
> At 23:31 14/06/2003 +0200, Daniel Borgmann wrote:
> >I don't see no mental mess anywhere. If you have 3GB of music for
> >example, the folder will be a mess, whatever you do (unless you use a
> >huge hierarchy of genre and artists which would be horrible). But you
> >don't have to care about this if you can just tell the computer what
> >kind of Music it should show you (what you recently listened to, your
> >favorites, music from a certain artist or genre, and so on). In fact it
> >would not even be necessary to have a Music folder, if the system could
> >simply take all the music files on your computer (and other computers?)
> >for the database.
>
> So if I'm not mistaken you want to go from a concept where the user uses
> folders to store stuff and manually manage all his files to limiting the
> amount of folders and manage them virtually if you want. Filters could be
> applied on all sorts of criteria, even time last or most accessed. If it
> would be possible that would be a great step forwards in managing files.
>
> But I think the question "in panel or on desktop or wherever" wouldn't
> really matter if things would go in that direction because you limit the
> amount of actual folders you make and space isn't an issue anymore. Given
> that system, things would condense automatically so you could even put
> everything in on Nautilus window.
Yes but you still have to physically store those files somewhere. :) And
if $HOME is displayed on the desktop (like Dave and others are
suggesting), then I'm worried that this could ride us into deep trouble.
Unless we change this model AGAIN at a later point.
> ps. Just a sidenote, working with filters and virtual folders -if you can
> call it that- would make it pretty hard to backup specific stuff without a
> really good tag/labelling system.
True, the future is offering interesting problems. ;)
Daniel
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]