Re: [Usability]HIG should advise against Yes/No in confirmation alerts
- From: John Levon <levon movementarian org>
- To: Sean Middleditch <elanthis awesomeplay com>
- Cc: usability gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Usability]HIG should advise against Yes/No in confirmation alerts
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 17:08:54 +0100
On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 11:33:20AM -0400, Sean Middleditch wrote:
> The HIG does cover this (last time I read thru it, anyways, which wasn't
> long ago) - you should _never_ say "we should do this action, is that
> ok?", but instead state "there is this condition/state, what do you want
> to do?" and put the actions in the buttons.
Well, the example dialogs do not do this for the Primary Text.
> The reasoning is pretty good. The problem is that the meaning of Yes
> and No is wholly dependent on the way the question is phrased. If you
> have "You have unsaved changes, save first? [Yes][No]" in one app, and
> "You have unsaved changes, quit anyway? [Yes][No]" in another, the user
Hold on a minute, I wasn't arguing for using Yes/No, I thought we'd
already agreed that sucked :)
I'm asking for a rationale for the "never ask a question" statement.
regards,
john
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]