Re: Calum's challenge and Luis' rant [was Re: [Usability]A Challenge: Describe the GNOME 4.0 interface.]

[Luis Villa <louie ximian com>]

BTW, it was mentioned somewhere in this thread (that I can't find right
now) that it might be useful to do 'themed' reviews. I tend to agree;
here are a couple simple consistency issues it might be good for someone
to check every gnome2.2 app for:

toolbar spacing: yelp and several of the gnome-games have toolbar icons
that are an icon or two 'off.' I'm sure there are others.

yes/no audit: find instances of yes/no dialogs and suggest better
strings. 

Anyway, just some more thoughts to throw out there-
Luis

On Fri, 2002-11-08 at 13:37, Glynn Foster wrote:
> Hey there,
> 
> > That having been said, Luis is right. But here's a question: should we
> > do UI reviews for core applications that haven't been ported to GNOME 2
> > yet? e.g. gAIM, Evolution, Anjuta, etc...
> 
> To be perfectly honest, I think we have enough to do reviewing the
> current applications. I think we can move onto the others over time,
> when they get ported. By all means file bugs against those applications
> in bugzilla - but please don't use the [UI-REVIEW] string, since I'd
> like to preserve some degree of control over the bug list.
> 
> 			See ya,
> 				Glynn ;)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Usability mailing list
> Usability gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability
>