Re: [Usability]application crititque
- From: Reinout van Schouwen <reinout cs vu nl>
- To: Luciano Chavez <lnx1138 us ibm com>
- Cc: usability gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Usability]application crititque
- Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 17:34:07 +0200 (CEST)
Hello Luciano,
> http://evms.sourceforge.net/gui_screen/
>
> I would appreciate any feedback from y'all.
okay, I didn't go through all of them but here are some random comments:
creation_options_lvm2.jpg:
- 'Page 1' and 'Page 2' is non-descriptive. Tell the user what he can find
on the tab.
- for the two yes/no options, a checkbox is better suited I think;
- I don't see a (*) anywhere, so why say '(*) Indicates field is
required'? Also, since this is a GUI, why not use color coding as well for
required fields?
- Does the checkbox 'Display all options' have an immedeate effect on the
UI? If so, use an 'Advanced' button instead.[1]
volume_view_lvm.jpg:
- Reconsider if a toolbar is required here (only three buttons, of which
the 'Exit' button shouldn't be there. See also
http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gup/hig/draft_hig/toolbars.html#AEN1204
- 'The operation completed successfully'. Which operation?
snap_details.jpg:
- Since there is only one page, the 'Page 1' tab is completely
unnecessary and can only lead to confusion.
[1] I remember a discussion about this a while ago, not sure what was the
outcome...
--
Reinout van Schouwen Artificial Intelligence student
email: reinout cs vu nl mobile phone: +31-6-44360778
GPG public key http://www.cs.vu.nl/~reinout/reinout.asc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]