Re: [Usability] Instant Apply Windows
- From: Kenny Graunke <kenny whitecape org>
- To: usability gnome org
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Usability] Instant Apply Windows
- Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 20:56:44 -0800
Jeff,
I find this to be a good compromise. If an instant apply property box does
need help, this puts it there, rather than assuming it doesn't need it. I
like "Done", much better, as it implies that you -do- things in the box and
then you're "Done".
I wouldn't add or remove things from this proposal, really. Adding a revert
would add complexity ("what exactly is being reverted?" is the first
question that comes to mind), removing [Done] or [X] would undoubtedly annoy
someone, ... this seems reasonable as is.
I agree with George's post on using PonG - though I'm not exactly sure
what PonG is, we definately should have some standard property box system so
that we don't get a lot of inconsistency. If PonG does that, great. Use it! :)
--Dekar
<quote who="Jeff Waugh">
> Hi all,
>
> In the interests of fostering some more direct discussion on the topic, here
> is what I consider to be a reasonable compromise. Please follow up with
> arguments as to why *this particular idea* may be suboptimal, inaccessible,
> unusable, etc.
>
> [ I don't think it's necessarily perfect, I'd just prefer to see discussion
> on concrete ideas rather than random musings and flame. ]
>
> +---------------------------------------+
> | My Crackrock Settings _ X |
> +---------------------------------------+
> | |
> | [ ] Goat-inspired |
> | [ ] Monkey-inspired |
> | [ ] Pants-inspired |
> | [ ] HP-inspired |
> | |
> | [ Help ] [ Done ] |
> | |
> +---------------------------------------+
>
> Things to note: available WM buttons, help and done (same style as
> dialogues).
>
> - Jeff
>
> --
> W.O.R.K: Weekend Over, Resume the Killings.
> _______________________________________________
> Usability mailing list
> Usability gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability
--
Windows has its place. Not in my place, but it does have a place.
- Thomas Cherryhomes
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]