[Usability]Re: nautilus 2.1.3 and thumbnail sizes
- From: Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- To: "Thomas 'Dent' Mirlacher" <dent cosy sbg ac at>
- Cc: nautilus-list gnome org, <usability gnome org>
- Subject: [Usability]Re: nautilus 2.1.3 and thumbnail sizes
- Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 04:21:24 -0500 (EST)
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Thomas 'Dent' Mirlacher wrote:
> hi list,
>
> i have a directory with images of the same resolution, but some of them are
> smaller than 16k and some of them are larger.
>
> nautilus right now will present images >16k as thumbnails (including the
> framing), but images <16k as themselfs.
>
> an obvious solution would be to use this patch:
>
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/gnome/nautilus/libnautilus-private/nautilus-icon-factory.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.283
> diff -u -r1.283 nautilus-icon-factory.c
> --- nautilus-icon-factory.c 5 Dec 2002 19:19:31 -0000 1.283
> +++ nautilus-icon-factory.c 8 Dec 2002 19:59:58 -0000
> @@ -738,8 +738,7 @@
> custom_icon,
> nautilus_file_peek_vfs_file_info (file),
> mime_type,
> - GNOME_ICON_LOOKUP_FLAGS_EMBEDDING_TEXT |
> - GNOME_ICON_LOOKUP_FLAGS_SHOW_SMALL_IMAGES_AS_THEMSELVES,
> + GNOME_ICON_LOOKUP_FLAGS_EMBEDDING_TEXT,
> &lookup_result);
> ===================================================================
>
> ... ok it has its downsides, but it will (IMHO) improve useability
Nautilus has always done this, and i consider it the right thing to do.
Adding thumbnails for a directory of small icons is useless and slow.
We may want to tune the limit a bit though.
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc
alexl redhat com alla lysator liu se
He's a globe-trotting guitar-strumming cop who dotes on his loving old ma.
She's a mentally unstable red-headed mechanic looking for love in all the
wrong places. They fight crime!
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]