Re: [Usability]GNOME-SEARCH-TOOL: Comment Request
- From: Seth Nickell <snickell stanford edu>
- To: Dennis Cranston <dennis_cranston yahoo com>
- Cc: merchan baton phys lsu edu, Chris Chabot <chabotc xs4all nl>, usability gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Usability]GNOME-SEARCH-TOOL: Comment Request
- Date: 14 Aug 2002 16:37:01 -0500
On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 12:54, Dennis Cranston wrote:
>
> --- Gregory Merchan <merchan phys lsu edu> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 10:16:12AM -0700, Dennis Cranston wrote:
> > > --- Gregory Merchan <merchan phys lsu edu> wrote:
> > <snip>
> > > > If you look at Calum's proposal, he uses "Advanced Options":
> > > > http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gup/proposals/searchtool.html
> > > >
> > >
> > > But, I would prefer not to use the word "Advanced" again. I read somewhere
> > > that newer users do not explore sections labeled as advanced.
> >
> > Hehe. :-) Maybe just "Options"?
> >
> > Actually, that seems really odd to me. I'm thinking "factors", "limits",
> > or "contraints" is more fitting. But I'd rather defer to the docs team.
> >
>
> A few other suggestions ... "Other Options" or "Additional Options"?
I like "Additional Constraints", or "Additional Search Constraints".
-Seth
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]