Re: [Usability]Re: Control Center must-fix draft
- From: nils <n p sun com>
- To: usability gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Usability]Re: Control Center must-fix draft
- Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2001 12:13:05 -0600
We have been discussing nomeclature alot. I am guessing that if
there was one word solution that solves all our problems, someone
would have suggested it by now :)
Attached is a solution, which I quite like, which would allow us
to use more explicit revert/reset/undo terminology. It also may
provide a solution for returning settings to 'factory defaults'.
Nils
Seth Nickell wrote:
> On 07 Sep 2001 10:27:14 +0100, Glynn Foster wrote:
> > Brian Crescimanno wrote:
> > >
> > > I agree with Michael here. Multiple levels of undo would be great, but
> > > a lot of users don't understand that type of multiple "undo" and how it
> > > works. The "cancel" button says to them "forget about everything I've
> > > done since I opened up this dialog....go back to the way it was!"
> >
> > Hum, just for the record, I think multiple levels of undo are bad - simply
> > because a dialog should never be complex enough to need it. I think I would
> > prefer a simple 'undo' or 'reset' to restore the settings/preferences back to
> > how they appeared when the dialog was first opened.
>
> I agree, but I think we need a better word to express this than either
> "Cancel" or "Revert".
>
> _______________________________________________
> Usability mailing list
> Usability gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]