Re: Control Center must-fix draft
- From: Adam Elman <aelman users sourceforge net>
- To: banthafodder connectfree co uk
- Cc: Seth Nickell <snickell stanford edu>, usability gnome org
- Subject: Re: Control Center must-fix draft
- Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:45:44 -0700
At 1:14 PM +0100 9/6/01, Michael Rogers wrote:
Seth Nickell wrote:
After some discussion, and a re-evaluation of the existing dialogue
proposal, we propose the
control center use "[Help] [Undo] [Done]". Help is optional, but
of course desirable.
Undo only undoes the last change. Done closes the dialogue. All
preferences should take effect as soon as the user changes them.
I think [Cancel] would be more useful than [Undo]. [Cancel] is a
psychologically important button for nervous users: it's the panic
button. If you have screwed things up, then tried to put them right and
just made them worse, you can always hit [Cancel]. But if you've made
several changes it might be too late to hit [Undo]. I suggest
[Help] [Cancel] [Done]
The problem with "Cancel" in this case is that in an instant-apply
dialog, it's not clear what it should do. Should Cancel undo only
the most recent change and then close the dialog, or should it undo
all changes since the dialog was opened and then close it? Plus,
once you close the dialog it's annoying to have to reopen it to see
what the changes were reverted to.
I think that a multi-level Undo is just as good as a "panic" button
for users as "Cancel", and has the added advantage that it doesn't
close the dialog, so the user can continue to use the dialog to make
changes.
Now, this assumes that the CC dialogs are in fact instant-apply; I
have recently proposed that they shouldn't necessarily be. If
they're not, then "Cancel" and "OK" (or, my preferred "Apply and
Close") make more sense than "Undo".
Adam
--
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]