I wonder if removing those .stamp files should be part of any make-target that is ~ standard for packaging tooling? In my opinion should such generated .c files share the rules of .o files. On Sun, 2017-04-09 at 19:28 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
2017-04-09 19:04 GMT+02:00 Philip Van Hoof <philip codeminded be>:Correct. Is there anything holding you back from rerunning valac after applying a patch during dpkg-buildpackage?No, not really. I guess I would just remove the vala.stamp files to force the regeneration of the .c files. That should be all that's needed afaics.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part