On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 13:15 +0000, Martyn Russell wrote:
We've included projects in the source tree before and still do, e.g. gvdb, libstemmer, etc.
Ahhh. So precedent then. Good.
We prefer not to.
Completely understood.
But if there is no packaging and the project is not dead (i.e. has good activity),
Does that condition preclude FAM then?
we're happy to include source if it helps people using the project.
I think (real) FAM is the only real answer to using Tracker on NFS isn't it? Does that tip the balance of FAM not being actively maintained in favor of usability on NFS? Cheers, b.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part