Re: [Tracker] miner-fs: Placing monitors on directories takes way too much time

["Chen, Zhenqiang" <zhenqiang chen intel com>]

> Hum, yes, that's the idea actually; I don't understand why you say it's
> a regression. CREATED and UPDATED events will get merged in the SPARQL
> buffer, and the buffer will be flushed (commited to the store) 
> if any of

Regression means it takes more time than other branches. 
But I expect it should take less time than other branches.

> Yes, but we are currently limiting the items in the buffer to have all
> the same parent (all files in the same directory). If during 
> crawling or
> event processing, different files from different directories are
> updated, they won't get merged in the same SPARQL connection. This
> constraint can probably me removed, but not sure how it would 
> affect the
> overall logic in the miner-fs.

The conditions are the same as those in "miner-fs-merge-updates" branch, which 
has better performance. 

Thanks!
-Zhenqiang