Re: [Tracker] Additions to Tracker Ontology for Chinese Use Cases



Hi Matthew,

2010/10/14 Compton, Matthew <matthew compton windriver com>
Would the Tracker maintainers be OK with additions to Tracker's ontology described below if I submit a patch?

 Those changes are platform dependant so i think it is ok to have them in your custom ontology. Duplicate properties in the ontology to put the T9 transcription sounds a bad idea: now it works for contacts but later we would need the same for PostalAddress and more and more string properties.

 I think the right solution would be to implement the T9 transcription as a second collation for certain properties (marked with tracker:collateT9 in the ontology). Not sure if this is possible with a fair level of complexity (Aleksander probably can help here). Those patches would be very welcome :)

 Regards,

Ivan



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]