Re: [Tracker] more issues with indexer-split

[Martyn Russell <martyn imendio com>]

Jamie McCracken wrote:
> Could we also reduce memory usage by not statically linking to the
> private libs libtracker-common and libtracker-db?

Those libraries should not be available for public use. Before doing so,
each API would have to be:

a) Documented
b) Checked it needs to be public
c) Versioned
d) ...

This is a lot of work and I don't think it is worth it.
I haven't looked at the footprints myself though.

> currently my FTS module and the file-indexer-module are ~ 1MB in size
> due mostly to linking with them and im sure the size of trackerd and
> tracker-indexer could be made smaller too with only one instance of
> those libs in memory

How does the memory footprint compare to the old tracker?

-- 
Regards,
Martyn