Re: [Tracker] memory leaks on r1275

["Ivan Frade" <ivan frade gmail com>]

Hi Tshepang,

 The search code is essentially the same, so the leak is still there.

 I think we can fix those things _after_ the merge. One of the points
of moving to trunk is that we can use the bugzilla again. Now we
should comment the bug saying "fixed in branch" and then check the
bugs again to mark them as fixed.

 It is easier to move to trunk and do the bugtriaging after that, i think.

 Thanks for your test!

Ivan

On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <tshepang gmail com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <tshepang gmail com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 6:24 AM, Jamie McCracken
> > <jamiemcc blueyonder co uk> wrote:
> > >  On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 17:38 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> > >  > Hi,
> > >  >
> > >  > Please try this - go search for a term guaranteeing a great number of
> > >  > results (>20,000) and watch top reporting trackerd RAM usage
> > >  > increasing at >1MB each search (Alt+F), much faster than TST.
> > >  >
> > >
> > >  pls file bug for this
> >
> > Just did... http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531268
>
> I got surprised that this bug is still seen on indexer-split r2038.
>
>
> --
> my place on the web:
> floss-and-misc.blogspot.com
> _______________________________________________
> tracker-list mailing list
> tracker-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list