Re: [Tracker] Independent Tracker (developer question)
- From: "Renhart Gittens" <renhart gittens ouls ox ac uk>
- To: "Cesar Izurieta" <cesar ecuarock net>
- Cc: tracker-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Tracker] Independent Tracker (developer question)
- Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 10:26:54 +0100
2007/8/30, Renhart Gittens <
renhart gittens ouls ox ac uk>:
Hi,
I
would like to know how feasible it would be compile tracker and
its
components such that it is self-contained and does not
necessarily
spread itself throughout the operating system and is
independent. I am
interested in the possibility of deploying it on
machines which contain
archival material which we want to
index.
When I use the term deploy I don't mean install. I just want to
be able
to run it from for example a remote machine (which can see the
data) or
USB stick.
My development machine runs openSuse 10.2 (KDE
)on which I've
successfully compiled tracker 0.6.1 (after much devel
library loading).
My archival machines both run Suse 10.0 at present and
the archival data
sits on NAS disks.
I don't want to compile
tracker on the archival machines as it requires
development libraries etc
which would basically pollute the machines
and make the long-term
preservation activity even more complex.
It is not yet clear to me
what runtime libraries tracker requires to be
present to execute. I've set
the prefix to /opt/tracker but I'd already
installed all the libraries to
get it to compile.
I must admit I'm not very familiar with the GNU
build environment and
the Gnome/KDE issues which impact tools such as
tracker and strigi.
Thanks in advance for any
advice.
Renhart
_____
Renhart Gittens
Software
Engineer,
Paradigm & Cairo
Oxford University Library
Services
Osney One Building, Osney Mead
Oxford, OX2 0EW
Web : http://www.paradigm.ac.uk
http://cairo.paradigm.ac.uk
Telephone
& voice mail: +44 (0)1865 280584
Facsimile: +44 (0)1865
204937
_______________________________________________
tracker-list
mailing list
tracker-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list
Do you want to run searches on the archival machines or just on a
remote machine?
[Renhart Gittens]
1.
Preferably we would run the search actually on the archival machine as they are
meant to be standalone for security reasons.
2.
However the searches could be run from a remote machine as I am
able to run virtual machines.
Thanks
again
Renhart
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]