Re: [Tracker] trackerd's memory consumption



On 1/11/07, Jamie McCracken <jamiemcc blueyonder co uk> wrote:
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> top says that trackerd consumes upwards of 60 MB of RAM. This is
> during heavy indexing and I wonder what's wrong, especially since this
> is 10x what's advertised. I run svn version dated less than a week
> ago.

we have recently added a 10,000 word limit to our parser which should
peg that back.

The main culprit is files with loads of numbers - I am going to make
number indexing optional (and off by default as its mostly worthless stuff)

Has this been implemented yet? I still managed to get ~60 MB with
yesterday's commit. I'm worried about the advertisement :-(



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]