Re: [Tracker] Tracker to do list



Laurent Aguerreche wrote:
Le jeudi 07 septembre 2006 Ã 17:05 +0100, Jamie McCracken a Ãcrit :
Jamie McCracken wrote:
Laurent Aguerreche wrote:
I wonder whether the use of strlen() on UTF-8 is correct, it
shouldn't... If I remember correctly, unicode can use arrays filled that
way:
'\0' 'H' '\0' 'E' '\0' 'L' '\0' L '\0' 'O'      ("HELLO")
where a '\0' can be replaced by a value to stock characters on 2 bytes.
But I don't remember if it happens with UTF-8. I'll have to check what
happen with strlen() and funky characters.
utf-8 is not unicode.

utf-8 if ascii is always 1 byte per character and is indistinguishable from plain text/ascii

Non-ascii is always 2-4 bytes per character (mostly 2 bytes though).
Also non-ascii bytes cannot contain an ascii character within its multibyte sequence. (multibyte characters in utf-8 always have bytes with most significant bit of 1 whereas ascii is always less than 128 so has msb of 0)

for ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTF-8

Ok, thank you.

So I introduced a bug in tracker-utils.c during my work on UTF8. :-)

In is_text_file(), I wrote:

        if (data_read) {
                char *s;

                s = g_locale_to_utf8 (buffer, 65565, NULL, NULL, NULL);

I propose this replacement:

        if (data_read) {
                char *s;

                s = g_locale_to_utf8 (buffer, -1, NULL, NULL, NULL);



yes thanks - seems I missed that one when reviewing your work. The buffer would need to be at most 4x the size of the input string to be fully utf-8 safe.

It might be worth checking if thats the case elsewhere in tracker.





--
Mr Jamie McCracken
http://jamiemcc.livejournal.com/




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]