Re: [Tracker] trackerd consumes over 6 MB of RAM

[zer0halo <zerohalo gmail com>]

My experience in running tracker for a couple of weeks on Edgy:

RAM: Tracker generally doesn't consume more that 3mb of RAM (except when doing the initial indexing).

Disk usage: Similar to Eyan's, about 30mb per 10GB indexed. My ~/.Tracker uses 31GB with the following tracker-stats for my home folder which is mostly documents:

Videos : 2 
Music : 61 
Development Files : 107 
Text Files : 765 
Folders : 1083 
Other Files : 1618 
Images : 3004 
Documents : 12923 
Total files indexed : 19563

On 11/16/06, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <tshepang gmail com> wrote:

On 11/16/06, Eyal Oren <eyal oren deri org> wrote:
> On 11/16/06/11/06 00:21 +0000, Jamie McCracken wrote:
> >this is another area we really beat Beagle too and a lot of other indexers
> >- disk usage.
> >
> >less than 70MB including full text for 200GB is excellent!
> hmm. on my system tracker uses quite some more diskspace, and I have not
> more than 30Gb indexed:
>
> eyal timmy ~ $ du -hs .Tracker/
> 95M     .Tracker/
>
> eyal timmy ~ $ tracker-stats
>
> -------fetching index stats---------
> Videos : 23
> Music : 1085
> Development Files : 3030
> Images : 5075
> Text Files : 5155
> Folders : 6517
> Documents : 8111
> Other Files : 16701
> Total files indexed : 45697
> ------------------------------------
>
>
> is that ok?

I think it's okay, because I actually posted my du output before
trackerd finished indexing (it was stalled by tracker-extract which
was stuck on some DVD vob files), and you have a whole lot of text
files, far more than me, I think.
_______________________________________________
tracker-list mailing list
tracker-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list

-- 
"Impossible is nothing."