Re: [Tracker] trackerd consumes over 6 MB of RAM

["Tshepang Lekhonkhobe" <tshepang gmail com>]

On 11/16/06, David Nielsen <david lovesunix net> wrote:
> tor, 16 11 2006 kl. 00:21 +0000, skrev Jamie McCracken:
> > Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> > > Tracker, currently indexing, consumes 18 MB of RAM, so you should
> > > probably remove the 3-6 MB consumption advertisement. It currently
> > > indexes about 200GB  of data of about 52,000 files.
> > >
> > > here's the output of du .Tracker/
> > > 1880    .Tracker/databases/Files/0001
> > > 1892    .Tracker/databases/Files/0002
> > > 1916    .Tracker/databases/Files/0003
> > > 1896    .Tracker/databases/Files/0004
> > > 7592    .Tracker/databases/Files
> > > 56712   .Tracker/databases
> > > 69992   .Tracker/
> >
> > this is another area we really beat Beagle too and a lot of other
> > indexers  - disk usage.
> >
> > less than 70MB including full text for 200GB is excellent!
> >
>
> Yeah I woke up one day and found my .beagle dir being +70GB. While
> probably a bug, this is especially bad since users don't really expect
> to have to monitor that kind of thing.

That's really disgusting. Luckily you had that much free space...