Re: Proposal for adding two new signals to the send queue
- From: Philip Van Hoof <spam pvanhoof be>
- To: Sergio Villar Senin <svillar igalia com>
- Cc: tinymail-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Proposal for adding two new signals to the send queue
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:57:07 +0100
Approved
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 19:56 +0100, Sergio Villar Senin wrote:
> Sergio Villar Senin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > from MUA developer's POV I think it'd be quite interesting to have two
> > new signals in the send queue that inform about the status of the send
> > queue, one of them would be issued when the queue starts to process the
> > messages and the other one would be sent when the queue stops to process
> > messages. Both would be emitted always even though none message was
> > processed.
>
> Second version of the patch, now the signal is issued just before
> creating the thread. This could be more useful because the thread could
> be theoretically delayed for some time, and with the new patch the
> client application could receive the signal before.
--
Philip Van Hoof, freelance software developer
home: me at pvanhoof dot be
gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org
http://pvanhoof.be/blog
http://codeminded.be
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]