Re: CONDSTORE capability support for tinymail's camel-lite
- From: Philip Van Hoof <spam pvanhoof be>
- To: tinymail-devel-list gnome org
- Cc: dave cridland net
- Subject: Re: CONDSTORE capability support for tinymail's camel-lite
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 17:28:23 +0100
A first problem (reminder for myself)
if (phighestmodseq && !strcmp (phighestmodseq, highestmodseq)) {
+ imap_folder->need_rescan = FALSE;
...
}
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 17:14 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> Well, it's not yet tested at all. I'm already posting this to have a
> copy for myself when I will actually test this tomorrow.
>
> This indeed needs some extensive testing. The removals are definitely
> not yet right (CHANGEDSINCE doesn't give you the expunged ones as far as
> I know). I'm probably going to checkout Polymer's code to figure out how
> Dave did it ;-)
>
> Again, it's not yet tested.
> _______________________________________________
> tinymail-devel-list mailing list
> tinymail-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tinymail-devel-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]